Colorado history is once again trying to get the story of the Sand Creek massacre right

Again in 2013, when the Colorado Historic Heart closed its first Sand Creek bloodbath exhibit on account of protests from Native People, it was little greater than an area scandal and a long-lasting embarrassment to the museum.

It was an early and defining second in a cultural motion that will develop stronger inside American cultural establishments over the subsequent decade. This museum realized the laborious method that storytelling reveals within the present period have to do precisely what the descendants of the victims of the brutal bloodbath and others demanded on the time: embody a number of voices and seek the advice of, each time attainable, with folks straight affected by the narrative on show.

From the Sand Creek Massacre exhibit, a portrait of George Bent and his wife, Magpie.  The two Western men gave early accounts that served as evidence of the brutality of the massacre.  (Courtesy of the Colorado History Center)
From the Sand Creek Bloodbath exhibit, a portrait of George Bent and his spouse, Magpie. The 2 Western males gave early accounts that served as proof of the brutality of the bloodbath. (Courtesy of the Colorado Historical past Heart)

The brand new model of the story exhibits how massively and in every single place museums have change into to set themselves up within the current second. The Sand Creek Bloodbath: The Betrayal That Modified the Cheyenne and Arapaho Folks Ceaselessly is described as a “partnership” between three tribal nations and museum employees. There are not any separate specialists in native historical past telling the story of how issues occurred. As a substitute, viewers hear one thing like a refrain of voices, coming collectively to cross on their private truths about this darkish chapter.

Not like many reveals in historical past museums, this one is performed from a first-person perspective. Guests study from indicators straight on the entrance that they may encounter tales concerning the occasion from fashionable Native People themselves “as we heard them from our elders.” It is this custom-made facet of the present that makes it all of the extra compelling.

The exhibition recounts the precise bloodbath intimately. The story goes again to November 29, 1864, when the U.S. Military attacked a Native American settlement and killed 230 males, ladies, and youngsters, who had been flying a white flag of give up and trusted the troops to guard them. The act of genocide adopted years of acquiescence within the territorial authority’s demand that American Indians depart their conventional properties and lands and confine themselves to camps.

Leave a Comment