Daniel Snyder’s attorney has returned to the House Oversight Committee’s investigation

Lawyers for the Washington leaders told the House Oversight and Reform Committee that the Democratic-led investigation into the workplace of team and franchise owner Daniel Snyder was a “politically inspired job” designed to remove Snyder from the NFL.

The assertions were made in a nine-page letter sent Wednesday to Representative Caroline B. Maloney (DNY), the committee’s chairwoman, and signed by Tom Davis, partner at Holland & Knight Law Firm representing the team. .

Davis, the former Republican congressman from Virginia who chaired the committee when it held hearings on performance-enhancing drug use in Major League Baseball, wrote that the committee’s investigation “may be coming to an end” and wanted to raise a series of concerns.

“The investigation into Washington’s leaders was not fair, comprehensive, or bipartisan, and it certainly did not seek the truth,” Davis wrote. “From the beginning, the commission has pursued one goal – to destroy Dan Snyder and his family and to attempt deception, insinuation and half-truths to expel him from the NFL. This investigation reeks of the lowest form of politics and its sole aim is the destruction of character.”

The Washington Post obtained a copy of Davis’ letter, which included a series of exhibits. The letter also mentioned two other lawyers for the leaders, Stuart Nash and John Brownlee. In a statement to a spokesperson, the committee said it sought an accurate account of where the team operated under Snyder’s ownership.

“Since launching this investigation one year ago, the commission’s focus has been on revealing the truth about leaders’ decades-old hostile workplace culture and finding legislative solutions to ensure that all employees are protected from abuse and harassment in their workplace,” the statement said. Leaders have recently claimed to have turned a new page, yet this latest effort to attack and intimidate former employees who came forward casts doubt on that assertion — as do the team’s ongoing efforts to prevent documents from being produced to a committee. Such methods will not discourage the commission’s investigation.”

Davis’ message comes in the middle Huge shift in sentiment toward Snyder among some NFL owners They are awaiting the results of an investigation commissioned by the league by attorney Mary Jo White. Several owners said recently that they believed that serious consideration could be given to trying to drive Snyder out of the league’s ownership ranks, either by persuading him to sell his franchise or by voting to remove him.

“It needs to be sold,” one owner said recently.

In a letter on Wednesday, Davis wrote: “Although I believe the committee will fail in its efforts to push Mr. or conduct. My only hope is that the American people – who are the ultimate judges – will see this investigation for what it is, a work inspired by politics, and begin the process of removing the stain of this investigation on a commission that I respect and love.”

NFL owners’ attitudes toward captain Daniel Snyder hardened

Davis wrote that the committee “did not request a single document from the leaders, except for some ad hoc requests during Mr.

Davis wrote that the committee “expressed little interest in the current state of the team’s workplace.” He said the committee “has embraced and protected some of those bitter about being forced to leave the team,” including former team boss Bruce Allen and former vice president of sales and customer service Jason Friedman.

In April, the commission sent a letter to the Federal Trade Commission It details allegations made by Friedman regarding financial wrongdoing involving the team and Schneider. The team denied any such wrongdoing. In June, as the committee was preparing to hold a hearing on Capitol Hill about the team’s whereabouts, Maloney sent a memo to fellow committee members saying that the committee’s investigation had uncovered evidence that Snyder and his attorneys conducted a “shadow investigation” Trying to discredit his accusers and shift the blame.

This effort was aimed at portraying Allen as primarily responsible for any workplace problems, according to Maloney’s June memo.

“It is widely recognized that the most important step the team took to remedy its toxic workplace was the removal of Mr. Allen,” Davis wrote in a letter on Wednesday. “The fraternity house culture that Mr. Allen instilled in the Leaders Organization is the main reason why leaders came under investigation in the first place.”

Davis described the efforts of “Mr. Snyder and the team to uncover evidence of unlawful conduct directed against him and his family” as “appropriate and separate from the NFL workplace investigation.” He also said the NFL “was aware of these efforts at the same time.”

Snyder Submit a voluntary affidavit under oath before the committee Remote for more than 10 hours in July. This came after he refused to attend the June 22 session and one of his lawyers Refusal to accept an electronic recall service by the committee.

According to Davis’ letter, Snyder denied to the committee the allegations made by Tiffany Johnston at a congressional roundtable in February. Johnston, a former fan and team marketing manager, told committee members that Snyder molested her at a team dinner, put his hand on her thigh and pressed her toward his limousine.

“For reasons the commission declined to make public, Mrs. Johnston was not required to take an oath before submitting her story,” Davis wrote. “In contrast, Mr. Snyder was asked to give sworn testimony, and the commission’s counsel strongly warned him of the criminal consequences of perjury. Mr. Snyder testified that he had no recollection of meeting Mrs. Johnston and certainly did not remember eating with her. Mr. Snyder and several of the staff Other current and former members of the Leaders’ Organization are willing to testify that they do not remember Mr. Snyder dining with any fan at a place like that pictured by Mrs. Johnston.”

Allen gave his testimony under a subpoena to the committee remotely for 10 hours last month.

“I believe the public has a right to know the truth about this NFL franchise and why the commission decided to isolate itself from the highly relevant information that has been available since the beginning of the investigation, and this goes against the commission’s prior narrative,” Davis wrote. issued by it, the reason why this evidence is considered unworthy even of its request in the context of the so-called “inquiry” of the Commission. “

Leave a Comment